We Tried atom.bio vs Bio.Sites for 30 Days: Results

Let’s be honest. 

Over 50 million people use Linktree and I can see why. It’s simple, it works, and it gets the job done. But as our social media needs grow, we start to see right through the limits of popular apps and their free plans.

After spending 30 days testing alternatives, I discovered something pretty incredible: ATOM.bio offers unlimited links with customization, analytics, and more, all for free. 

Yes, you read that right.

Here’s what most people don’t realize… 

Most link in bio tools lock essential features behind paywalls. ATOM.bio stands out by providing premium capabilities without the premium price tag. 

You can create a whole landing page in under five minutes, complete with tracking features that let you see which links are performing best. The analytics dashboard is sleek and intuitive and works for anyone, from seasoned marketers to complete beginners.

But how does it compare to Bio.sites when put through rigorous testing?

That’s exactly what I wanted to find out. 

So I rolled up my sleeves and used both platforms daily for a month. From setup speed to customization options, analytics capabilities to mobile optimization. I tested everything to determine which truly delivers the most value.

What I found amazed me. 

One platform emerged as my favorite.

If you’re tired of limited free plans and looking for the best Linktree alternatives that won’t break the bank, this will help you choose the right tool for your specific needs.

We found some good stuff. Now, let’s help you choose it!

Testing Setup and Evaluation Criteria

Look, I get it. Anyone can write a comparison based on feature lists and marketing claims. But that’s not how real creators make decisions. I needed to actually use these tools the way you would daily, for real projects, with real traffic.

So I drew up some testing conditions. After researching the most effective ways to evaluate link in bio tools, I focused on realistic daily-use scenarios.

The Test: Instagram and TikTok for lifestyle and shop

For this part, I thought of a content creator’s daily usage: managing lifestyle content across Instagram and TikTok while simultaneously running an online shop. It’s what many content creators face today: the need to direct followers from platforms with limited link options to multiple destinations.

Why this specific setup? 

Instagram and TikTok are where link in bio tools matter most. Plus, they cater to different but overlapping audiences, requiring a bio link solution that works seamlessly across both.

Throughout the testing time, I kept identical content on both platforms, sharing lifestyle posts and shop promotions that directed followers to each link in bio tool. This approach helped me to evaluate how effectively each solution served as a bridge between social content and monetization opportunities.

Here’s how I put them to the test. To be fair, I judged both platforms on four key things:

1. Setup: How fast could I actually get a working page live? Was it easy to figure out?
2. Customization: Could I make it feel like my brand? I checked what design tools and integrations were available to make the page truly mine.
3. Analytics: What kind of data did they show me? Was that data actually useful for understanding my audience and making the page better?
4. Performance: Did the pages load quickly? And was the experience just as smooth on my phone as it was on my desktop?

While all of these were important, I paid extra close attention to the analytics. If you can’t measure what’s working, it’s hard to improve over time.

I made sure to test both tools under the exact same conditions.

I signed up for both on the same day, used the same logos and links, and tested everything on the same iPhone and MacBook. I even used the same Wi-Fi network to keep the internet speed consistent.

To get real data, I posted just as often from each page to drive traffic to them. I tried out the free versions and the paid features for each one. I also ran some A/B tests with different layouts to see which designs actually got people to click more.

This wasn’t just about comparing feature lists. It was about seeing how they perform.

The result? 

After the 30-day testing period, I could confidently assess which platform delivered better results for managing lifestyle content and shop links across Instagram and TikTok.

ATOM.bio: Setup, Features, and More

ATOM.bio stood out because of its incredible setup speed and feature set. Unlike other platforms that promise simplicity yet deliver complexity.

Setup Time: Under 5 Minutes to Launch

Honestly, the frictionless setup process with ATOM.bio impressed me. I created a complete landing page in under five minutes from start to finish. 

What’s interesting about this tool is how effortless the entire process felt. 

The platform does away with unnecessary steps, allowing you to pick a design and start customizing immediately. There’s no learning curve either. The interface shows exactly what you need without overwhelming you with options.

Widgets and Embeds: YouTube, Contact Forms, Carousels

Beyond basic links, ATOM.bio provides an impressive array of content options.

You can even add Google Maps to show your location—perfect for businesses with physical premises. The best part? These features work seamlessly without requiring any coding knowledge.

Mobile Editing Experience: On-the-Go Customization

Now, here’s something that really matters. 

Most social media management happens on mobile devices, and ATOM.bio’s mobile editing features proved to be really dependable during testing. I could make changes to my page even while commuting on the train. The mobile interface maintains the same intuitive design as the desktop version, so you can make quick updates wherever you are.

Clicks, Views, and Traffic Sources

ATOM.bio includes analytics in its free version. The dashboard shows which links receive the most views and clicks, total page views, and traffic sources. This data proved incredibly useful when I was testing different promotional strategies throughout the week.

What really sets ATOM.bio apart? 

Unlike competitors that gate these analytics features behind paywalls, ATOM.bio makes them available to all users. I was able to make decisions based on what actually works, instead of guessing.

Bio.sites: Setup Experience and Limitations

Bio.sites presents itself as a link in bio solution from Squarespace, offering clean design and basic functionality. My hands-on testing revealed both strengths and significant limitations compared to what we just saw with ATOM.bio.

Initial Setup and Template Options

Setting up Bio.sites requires following a more traditional process. Users must claim a username, create an account, and select from available templates. The entire setup takes several minutes to complete as you move through multiple steps. 

Bio.sites offers designed templates across different styles, which is notably fewer than ATOM.Abio’s category-specific options.

Here’s where things get complicated… 

Despite its clean interface, Bio.sites’ initial setup involves more clicks than necessary. Once you’ve chosen a template, you’ll need to add your name, profile image, social handles, and links before your page goes live. The platform automatically publishes your site after setup, yet you’ll still need to continue editing to fully customize your page.

It felt like extra work for no real reason.

Customization Flexibility Compared to ATOM.bio

On the surface, Bio.sites seems reasonable. The platform allows users to customize fonts, colors, and backgrounds. You can choose from 18 font packs, 27 pre-designed color palettes, and add texture through glitter, paper, or animated gradient backgrounds.

But here’s the catch…

Certain advanced customization features are restricted or completely unavailable. For instance, on the free plan, you can only add five sections in total, whereas ATOM.bio offers unlimited sections without restrictions. Bio.sites charges transaction fees on creator payments 8% on the free plan while ATOM.bio provides monetization features without such high fees.

Five sections? Really? 

That’s barely enough to showcase your content properly.

Analytics Capabilities: Basic vs Advanced

Bio.sites provides fundamental analytics that track visitor activity, including views, clicks, and clickthrough rates. The platform allows users to review data across different time ranges. You can also see which links receive the most clicks.

That sounds fine in theory, but…

The reporting in Bio.sites is pretty basic compared to ATOM.bio. It gives you simple numbers but doesn’t have the same depth to really help with decisions. It kinda feels like it was added as an afterthought. ATOM.bio is much stronger for digging into your traffic and seeing how you’re improving over time.

Mobile Optimization and Editing Experience

One area where Bio.sites performs nicely is mobile optimization. The platform is mobile-first by design, making it functional across devices. Bio.sites offers both web and mobile editing through the Unfold app, allowing you to make changes from anywhere.

However, there’s a problem. 

Some features are only available through the Unfold mobile app, which limits desktop editing capabilities. This restriction contrasts with ATOM.bio’s consistent cross-platform experience where all features work identically across mobile and desktop interfaces.

The bottom line? 

Bio.sites functions as a basic link in bio solution with clean design principles, yet it consistently falls short of ATOM.bio’s feature set. The limitations become apparent quickly, especially when you realize you’re paying fees for features that other platforms offer freely.

Design, Branding, and Customization Options

The thing is, visual branding can make or break your link in bio page. After 30 days of testing, I discovered some pretty significant differences between these platforms in how they handle design elements.

Visual Control: Fonts, Colors, Layouts

With ATOM.bio, you can take your pick of colors, fonts, backgrounds, and layouts to match your brand identity. It lets you upload your own background images for free, creating a truly personalized experience. 

Now, that’s something you don’t see every day.

Bio.sites offers reasonable customization with 18 font packs and 27 pre-designed color palettes, but here’s the catch: it’s more restrictive in how these elements can be combined.

Custom Domains and Branding Removal

Custom domains can seriously impact your brand appearance. Both platforms support custom domain connections, but Bio.sites requires upgrading to their Pro plan first. ATOM.bio also supports custom domains but offers way more value throughout their free tier.

Here’s where it gets interesting. 

Unlike many competitors that slap their logos all over your page, ATOM.bio keeps things cleaner and focuses on your content rather than their service.

Clean vs Cluttered Interfaces

Now, let’s talk about the actual user experience. 

ATOM.bio presents an intuitive, clutter-free design that makes customization simple. Even with all those extensive features, the platform remains user-friendly.

Bio.sites offers a clean interface initially, but becomes less intuitive when you’re trying to do advanced customizations. The split between web editing and mobile-only features through their Unfold app creates unnecessary complications for users who just want a streamlined experience.

After extensive testing, ATOM.bio clearly delivers superior design freedom and branding control. All without premium pricing barriers.

Pricing and Value for Money

Pricing ultimately determines which link in bio tool delivers genuine value, and honestly, what I discovered during my testing completely changed my perspective on what these platforms should cost.

ATOM.bio Free Plan: What’s Actually Free

I’ll be straight with you.

ATOM.bio’s free plan blew me away. We’re talking about unlimited links, 100% customization options, full analytics access, contact forms, QR code generation, file uploads, and even product selling capabilities. 

All completely free. 

Unlike competitors that restrict essential functions, ATOM.bio gives you everything without any hidden charges or surprise limitations.

Now, they do have a premium plan at $3.99 monthly or $24 annually. That’s $2/month, a 50% savings.

But here’s the thing: most users find the free version perfectly sufficient since none of the core functionality is restricted. 

That’s pretty rare in this space.

Bio.sites Pricing: The “Free” That Isn’t Really Free

On the other hand… 

Bio.sites promotes itself as “totally free”, but my testing revealed some frustrating limitations. The free plan restricts you to only five sections total. Five sections. That’s it. Plus, Bio.sites charges substantial transaction fees, 8% on all payments received through their free plan.

Did I mention the 8% fee? 

That means if you’re selling anything through your bio link, Bio.sites takes a cut of every sale. ATOM.bio doesn’t do this.

What bothered me most is how Bio.sites gates essential features that ATOM.bio provides freely. It’s like they’re dangling the “free” label while making you pay for anything useful.

Which Tool Actually Delivers Value?

After thorough testing, this wasn’t even close. With ATOM.bio, you get everything: unlimited sections, complete customization, and analytics. All without spending a cent.

Bio.sites and similar platforms? 

They restrict fundamental capabilities until you upgrade. This approach forces users to pay for features that should be standard.

The Branding Question

Both platforms display minimal branding on free accounts, but ATOM.bio’s premium plan removes all promotional elements, including the ‘Create your free site’ button and signup menu. This creates a cleaner, more professional experience that builds trust with your audience.

But here’s what I love about ATOM.bio’s approach.

They don’t nickel-and-dime you. Almost everything is free, and the paid features are actually affordable and useful. It really feels like they care more about helping users than just making money.

How Do These Link in Bio Tools Actually Compare?

Here’s exactly what I found after testing both platforms side by side:

The differences are pretty striking, right? 

While Bio.sites markets itself as “totally free,” the reality is quite different once you start using it. ATOM.bio delivers what it promises without the fine print.

Conclusion

After 30 days of rigorous testing between the two, the results speak for themselves. ATOM.bio clearly emerges as the superior link in bio tool across all critical metrics.

The most striking difference? 

ATOM.bio’s approach to feature accessibility while Bio.sites restricts users to just five sections on their free plan and charges a transaction fee.

Setup speed further distinguishes these platforms. ATOM.bio’s speedy setup process contrasts sharply with Bio.sites’ multi-step approach.

ATOM.bio delivers more design freedom. Users can fully personalize colors, fonts, backgrounds, and layouts without requiring CSS knowledge or premium subscriptions.

The mobile experience likewise favors ATOM.bio, with full functionality available on smartphones compared to Bio. sites’ fragmented approach requiring the separate Unfold app for certain features.

What I discovered during my month-long test… 

I consistently found ATOM.bio more intuitive, more powerful, and more valuable than Bio.sites. The platform simply delivers more for less—specifically, everything for free.

Bottomline? 

For all creators out there, if you’re looking for the best link in bio tool without any paywalls or sneaky limits, ATOM.bio is the hands-down winner!

After trying a bunch of options, I’d totally recommend it for anyone who’s serious about making their social profiles work better.

FAQs

Q1. What are the key differences between ATOM.bio and Bio.sites? ATOM.bio offers unlimited links, full customization, and comprehensive analytics for free, while Bio.sites limits users to 5 sections on the free plan and charges transaction fees. ATOM.bio also provides faster setup, more design freedom, and better mobile functionality.

Q2. How long does it take to set up a link-in-bio page with these tools? With ATOM.bio, you can create a complete landing page in under 5 minutes. Bio.sites requires several minutes with multiple steps to complete the initial setup process.

Q3. What customization options are available on the free plans? ATOM.bio allows full customization of colors, fonts, backgrounds, and layouts without restrictions. Bio.sites offers more limited options with 18 font packs and 27 pre-designed color palettes.

Q4. How do the analytics capabilities compare between the two platforms? ATOM.bio provides comprehensive analytics including views, clicks, traffic sources, and performance comparisons, all for free. Bio.sites offers more basic analytics with limited metrics like views, clicks, and click-through rates.

Q5. Are there any hidden costs or transaction fees to be aware of? ATOM.bio doesn’t mention any transaction fees and offers all features for free. Bio.sites charges an 8% transaction fee on payments received through their free plan and restricts certain features to paid tiers.